Buying Domains For Investment Vs Development

Something that has seemed to come up more than normal in conversations this week with various people is the difference in buying domain names for development versus buying domain names for investment. When I look at buying for development I have completely different metrics as well as intangibles that I think about as compared to when I buy a domain name for investment and gain.
I am sure many will say in either case you will always need the .COM, well as is obvious I do not necessarily agree with that. Although there will always be some level of direct type-ins for extremely high value two word or one word generic .COMs for anything below the absolute top in many cases the amount of type in traffic can easily be exceeded through proper SEO and marketing. I am sure people will disagree but I have enough evidence to the the contrary that makes it a simple fact for me. And enough people have talked about their keyword domains, even decent ones, not having traffic and that is why they develop.
The other argument heard frequently is that you will lose type in traffic to the .COM. Well, I have no doubt I lose some type in traffic from people typing in the .COM version of the domain I develop on a non .COM but it is a small amount, the amount of money spent on acquiring the .COM far exceeds the amount, in many cases, needed to brand and market the non .COM to a high enough traffic level to not worry about the traffic leakage. Once again, feel free to tell me I am crazy, does not bother me. When you are developing it is about the business not the name.
Now, all that said there is no way anyone can say that the best value for investing is not keyword generic .COMs and .NETs. But holding a name for something other than development changes the way you look at it. As an investment you look at the marketplace to either find opportunities (native cctlds) or names that inherently have value (.COMs and .NETs). I buy very few names outside of .COM and .NET for investment purposes.
I view buying a domain for development by looking at a business plan, now if I can fit in the acquisition of a high dollar .COM as part of the plan then well, that may be the best option. But if that acquisition would kill the business from the beginning so it can never make it off the ground then does it make sense to never start the business. No it does not, a good business plan is a good business plan, it is not about the name. As domainers sometimes we miss the point, I would venture to say that most who make comments like "I would never start without the .COM" have never put together a full business plan (although there are people that have done very well, but they had the funds to start with the bigger names, they are the exception not the rule, do not ever forget that.).
I cringe everytime I hear people say that the .COM should of been bought, etc. Well if a company received 500K to start and the .COM would cost them 300K, does it really make sense to go after the .COM if you can show a successful path to growing a brand and traffic. No, once again buying for development is much different than buying a name for investment.
Long story short, if you can afford a large investment in your generic .COM without killing the business plan sure, go for the .COM but do not ever let the name keep you from starting your business.


















Great post Bruce and while I too agree that owning a generic .COM is the way to go, I also know first hand that have a non-generic and even a non-.COM can still be successful with great Internet marketing strategies such as SEO, PPC, Link Building, Social Media, Affiliate Marketing, etc.
I bought the non-generic domain FoodCouponsDirect.com for only $8 and using my SEO and internet marketing skills, the site ranks in the top 3 of google for a search on: food coupons….needless to say I am literally making $XX,XXX per year from the site.
So yes, if you are passionate about a topic/subject and have a keyword enriched domain name (.COM or not) you can still level the playing field and dominate the internet….
All the best,
Andrew
Yes, there are certain TLDs I would be hesitant to brand with but .COM asking prices are often in the stratosphere even when the traffic doesn’t justify the price.
@Andrew – Congrats on the success, and your comment is right on.
@Leonard – You are correct, there are some I would be hesitant, but in many cases if the majority of traffic is from SEO, brand marketing, or other creative ways .COM is not required.
As always, a disclaimer, a good portion of my names are .COM but that is because they are for investment, but when it comes to development my mind is much more open.
great post bruce, liked it! will have to bookmark this one and re read in the future.
@Jeff – Thanks. For some reason this has came up from not so typical people this week. Not sure why it seems to of popped up so much but felt it was a good topic to hit on.
You captured discussions well…the example we spoke of will be one of the first tests of you new development tool! As you may recall, this example was a .info TLD. I do not normally purchase these, but like you said, for targeted development tied to a great name that drives search and branding, I think this can be just as successful if not more than the .com version of this name
Good post
thanks jay! funny how a post can come from a phone call;)